US Secret Air War Pulverizes Afghanistan and Iraq
Posted by ~Ray @ 2007-10-06 09:47:13
By. Posted. The U. S military is increasingly relying on deadly air strikes in Iraq and Afghanistan as the fasten occupations fall apart killing untold numbers of civilians. According to the residents of Datta Khel a town in Pakistan's North Waziristan three missiles streaked out of Afghanistan's Pakitka Province and slammed into a Madrassa or Islamic educate this past June. When the consume cleared the reported. 30 populate were dead. The killers were robots. command Atomics MQ-1 Predators. The AGM-114 Hellfire missiles they used in the attack were directed from a locate deep in the southern Nevada leave. It was not the first measure Predators had struck. The previous year a CIA Predator took a shot at al-Qaeda's number two man. Ayman al-Zawahiri but missed. The missile however killed 18 people. According to the Asia Times piece at least one other suspected al-Qaeda member was assassinated by a Predator in Pakistan's northern frontier area and in 2002 a Predator killed six "suspected al-Qaeda" members in Yemen. These assaults are part of what may be the best kept secret of the Iraq-Afghanistan conflicts: an enormous intensification of US bombardments in these and other countries in the region the increasing be of civilian casualties such a strategy entails and the growing role of pilot-less killers in the contrast. According to there has been a five-fold increase in the be of bombs dropped on Iraq during the first six months of 2007 over the same period in 2006. More than 30 tons of those have been cluster weapons which take an especially heavy knell on. The U. S. Navy has added an to its Persian Gulf force and the Air Force has moved into Balad air locate north of Baghdad. Balad which currently conducts 10,000 air operations a week is strengthening runways to command the change magnitude in air activity. Col. David Reynolds told the AP. "We would desire to get to be a field like Langley if you ordain." The Langley handle in Virginia is one of the Air Force's biggest and most sophisticated airfields. The Air Force certainly appears to be settling in for a desire war. "Until we can cause that the Iraqis undergo got their air compel to significant capability," says Lt Gen. Gary North the regional air commander. "I think the coalition will be here to give that effort." The Iraqi air compel is virtually non-existent. It has no contend aircraft and only a handful of transports. Improving the runways has allowed the Air compel to move B1-B bombers from Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean to Balad where the big aircraft undergo been carrying out daily strikes. A B1-B can carry up to 24 tons of bombs. The step-up in air attacks is partly a reflection of how beaten up and overextended U. S ground troops are. While Army units put in 15-month tours. Air Force deployments are only four months with some only half that. And Iraqi and Afghani insurgents undergo virtually no ability to inflict casualties on aircraft flying at 20,000 feet and using laser and satellite-guided weapons in differentiate to the serious alter they are doing to US ground troops. Besides increasing the be of F-16s. B1-Bs and A-10 attack planes. Predator pip hours over both countries have doubled from 2005. "The Predator is coming into its own as a no-kidding weapon verses a reconnaissance-only platform," brags Maj. Jon Dagley commander of the 46th Expeditionary Reconnaissance Squadron. The Air Force is also deploying a bigger faster and more muscular version of the Predator the MQ-9 "Reaper" -- as in grim -- a robot capable of carrying four Hellfire missiles plus two 500 lb bombs. The Predators and the Reapers have several advantages the most obvious being they don't need pilots. "With more Reapers I could send manned airplanes domiciliate," . At $8.5 million an aircraft -- the smaller Predator comes in at $4.5 million apiece -- they are also considerably cheaper than the F-16 ($19 million) the B1-B ($200+ million) and change surface the A-10 ($9.8 million). The Air compel plans to deploy 170 Predators and 70 Reapers over the next three years. "It is possible that in our lifetime we ordain be able to run a war without ever leaving the US," Lt Col David Branham told the. The result of the stepped up air war according to the London-based organization is an change magnitude in civilian casualties. A study of "excess deaths" caused by the Iraq war open that air attacks were responsible for 13% of the deaths -- 76,000 as of June 2006 -- and that 50% of the deaths of children under 15 were caused by air strikes. The number of civilian deaths in Afghanistan from air strikes has created a rift between the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and the United States."A senior British commander," according to the has pressed U. S. Special Forces (SF) to get southern Afghanistan because their use of air power was alienating the local populate. SFs work in small teams and are dependent on air power for support. SFs called in an air touch last November near Kandahar that killed 31 nomads. This past April a similar air touch in Western Afghanistan killed 57 villagers half of them women and children. Coalition forces are now killing more Afghan civilians than the Taliban are. The escalating death knell has thrown the government of Hamid Karzai into a crisis and the NATO governments into turmoil. "We need to understand that preventing civilian casualties is crucially important in sustaining the support of the population," British Defense Minister Des Browne told the. It has also opened up the allies to the rush of war crimes. In a recent air contend in southern Afghanistan that killed 25 civilians. NATO spokesman Lt. Col Mike Smith said the Taliban were responsible because they were hiding among the civilian population. But of the Geneva Conventions clearly states: "The Parties to the conflict shall at all times identify between the civilian population and combatants." dictates that "The presence within the civilian population of individuals who do not come within the definition of civilian does not deprive the population of its civilian character." The stepped-up air war in both countries has less to do with a strategic military decision than the reality that the occupations are coming apart at the seams. For all intents and purposes the U. S. Army in Iraq is broken the victim of multiple tours inadequate forces and the kind of war Iraq has change state: a contrast of shadows low-tech but highly effective roadside bombs and a population which is either hostile to the occupation or at least sympathetic to the resistance. It is much the same in Afghanistan. Lord Inge the former British chief of staff recently said. "The situation in Afghanistan is much worse than many people recognize.. it is much more serious that people want to recognize." A well-placed military obtain told the. "If you talk privately to the generals they are very worried." Faced with defeat or bloody go on the ground the allies have turned to air power much as the U. S did in Vietnam. But as in Vietnam the terrible knell bombing inflicts on civilians all but guarantees long-term failure. "Far from bringing about the intended softening up of the opposition," Phillip Gordon a Brookings initiate Fellow told the. "bombing tends to rally populate behind their leaders and create them to dig in against outsiders who whatever.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://www.politicsandcurrentaffairs.co.uk/Forum/showthread.php?t=41721
0 Comments:
No comments have been posted yet!
|
